
![]() |
Dith Pran & Schanberg in The Killing Fields |
![]() |
TV Journalist Nandita in Peepli Live |
Reporting from the killing fields of Cambodia was not just the job of Schanberg as a journalist, but also the very essence of his existence. His involvement in the social and political life of the country and his in depth understanding of the subject and plight of the people made him the voice of the country. His life revolved around the people of the country he inhabited during that period. He tried to do justice to his profession in his endeavor to bring out the blatant truth behind the bombings in Cambodia during the Vietnam War. But for Nandita, Peepli was just “another brick in the wall”. Nandita, as a journalist doesn’t connect with the people of Peepli nor does she show the empathy that is exhibited in Schanberg’s character.
The Killing Fields establishes media as a responsible organisation which takes into account the agony of people by investigating in situations where keeping a watch over authority is required. Schanberg, a journalist brings out the loopholes in the US war strategy which turned nightmarish for the people of Cambodia because of the mistaken bombings on the country. Schanberg, by addressing this issue through the power of Press sets an example for journalists and his quest is also rewarded in the end. On the other hand, the television journalists (in Peepli Live) who come to cover a farmer’s (Natha) suicide show no sense of compassion towards him. Natha is just a subject of their story and they reduce journalism to mere sensationalism. Also, Peepli Live emphasises the accepted norm that the print media serves as the source of news or lays down the premises of a story. As far as the perception of media is concerned, print is considered a more serious form of journalism than the popular television journalism which thrives on “Yellow Journalism”, as shown in Peepli Live.
I think both the films are successful films about journalism and they give a fair idea of their times. The Killing Fields focuses more on the life of Schanberg as a journalist in the backdrop of the effect of the Vietnam War in Cambodia. While Peepli Live adequately presents the nuances of the world of television journalism in India today. Peepli Live comes alive in its portrayal of the real world of the media industry, especially television. The unending quest for ‘breaking news’ every other minute, the race for Television Rating Points (TRPs) among channels, the lack of empathy, unethical practices for getting a story, sensationalism in news, concocting of stories by journalists are some of the aspects of journalism brought out brilliantly in the course of the film.
From the time of Schanberg (70’s) when we also had journalists who were very respected, to the present time when public perception of media seems to have reached an all time low, what went wrong? Journalism is considered to be a noble profession. When we talk about the time of Schanberg (70’s), journalists were respected because of the work they did and the general perception was that journalists are empathetic people who served as a link between the public and the authority. Journalists were like watchdogs of government and media was a platform for the redressal of people’s grievances. As time passed, journalism gained momentum more as a commercial venture and journalists turned into propagandists of government and administrative bodies. Thus, the respect once commanded by them is coming down. The practice of unethical means has resulted in the overall deterioration of the media community. But generalising on this basis is not right since journalists still play a pivotal role in any country.
very true...to get back the lost respect.. our media industry does need many Schanbergs..gr8 observation..
ReplyDeleteThanks for your kind appreciation!
Delete